Could the # of hits ("views") be shown ON THE PORTAL PAGES THEMSELVES?...aside the individual vids? Now, I know that one can get an accounting, on the "Threads List" page...but(t) not for individual postings. (If a thread has multiple clips, one cannot assume that each viewing takes in ALL the offerings). I do hope my thoughts are being transmitted in an understandable manner. They appear quite lucid on my side of them.

Probably but I haven't the knowledge to set that up.

jw

Nor do I, but(t) if I possessed the site's "Blueprint" I would stare heroically at the tally clock which records, and THEN routes the # of "posts" (for each chap) to various places...one of which IS under the avatar pic aside each Portal Page. THIS one, of course would be the one we would be MOST curious about and trace it back-to-its-source. Then, parallel same, with a "VIEWS" path..."& Bob's Your Uncle!" (Similar to a back-handed method of deciphering particularly pernicious wiring problemmes.)

That is a terrific idea. I will do that!

jw

http://i1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa413/zuzulo56/Snap_20120123_20h30m40s_011.png
"That is pretty interesting. The arrows don't actually point to the right places, but so what. I have never seen that one before."--JFW
*********************************
Could not room be allocated for a smaller, permanent, graphic representation of the above. Until just a few days back, I didn't recognize the number of, and territorial responsibilities of, the various organizations. If, the first day I stumbled upon the VRR Forum, I had viewed it, as a fixture in one of the Side-Columns, well...well, I would have been better off for having seen, and studied, it.
I dare to imagine that most newcomers (some who are probably actually interested in racing to vintage wine emporiums) aren't as impressed as they deserve to be, 'cause of their failing to recognize the scope of...the enormity of, the N. American Vintage Racing foot-print. The graphic-in-question does it for me.
Or perhaps we could redo it, striving for a greater accuracy?